Arizona Supreme Court· 2/19/1982

State v. Ring

Citations

641 P.2d 862
131 Ariz. 374
1982 Ariz. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

no asportation was required for kidnapping, the essence of the crime being the unlawful restriction of the victim’s movements against the victim’s will
defendant compelled victim to drive to bank and return with cash by threatening harm to victim's spouse
“Ineffective assistance of counsel claims may not be predicated upon disagreements as to trial strategy.” (citations omitted)
“We will not judicially create an exception to the plain statutory wording.”
“Failure to argue frivolous or groundless matters does not make counsel ineffective.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.