State v. Padilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendants’ assertion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain their kidnapping convictions because movement of the victim was minimal
• rejecting defendants' assertion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain their kidnapping convictions because movement ofthe victim was minimal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Salamon
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-01· cited 243×
• Government of the Virgin Islands v. Warren P. Berry. Appeal of Warren Berry. Appeal of Guillermo Brignoni
  Third Circuit· 1979-08-07· cited 152×
• State v. Rattana Keo Phuong
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-22· cited 75×
• State v. Couch
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-08-21· cited 47×
• State v. Burchett
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-04-27· cited 24×
• State v. Linden
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-02-17· cited 22×
• Government of the Virgin Islands v. Ernesto Ventura
  Third Circuit· 1985-10-17· cited 16×
• State v. Ring
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-02-19· cited 14×
• State v. Raron
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-01-05· cited 4×
• State Of Washington v. Rattana Phuong
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-22

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bruton v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
• People v. Daniels
  California Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 510×
• People v. Chessman
  California Supreme Court· 1951-12-18· cited 252×
• State v. Jacobs
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-04-17· cited 44×
• State v. Pickard
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-12-08· cited 19×