Montana Supreme Court· 12/2/1993

State v. Rinehart

Citations

864 P.2d 1219
262 Mont. 204
50 State Rptr. 1517
1993 Mont. LEXIS 365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a previously reliable informant's report of criminal activity which was based on personal observation was sufficient to establish probable cause to issue a search warrant
holding that a previously reliable informant’s report of criminal activity which was based on personal observation was sufficient to establish probable cause to issue a search warrant
concluding that a search warrant application provided a substantial basis to conclude probable cause existed to issue the search warrant based on officer’s statement that informant was reliable in the past
concluding that a search warrant application provided a substantial basis to conclude probable cause existed to issue the search warrant based on officer's statement that informant was reliable in the past
stating that an \informant's personal observation of criminal activity does not constitute hearsay evidence\
stating that an “informant’s personal observation of criminal activity does not constitute hearsay evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jeffrey M. Sherlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Rinehart

30 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.