State v. Kaluza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that power usage information gathered by police that lacked “detailed comparisons” with average and previous resident’s usage was insufficient
• determining that power usage information gathered by police that lacked \detailed comparisons\ with average and previous resident's usage was insufficient
• stating that there is nothing inherently suspicious about a person advocating the use of marijuana
• stating that there is nothing inherently suspicious about a person advocating the use of marijuana
• holding insufficient affiant’s assertion, based on his training and experience, that the residences of marijuana manufacturers use more energy than a typical residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).