Idaho Supreme Court· 10/5/2021

State v. Howard

Citations

496 P.3d 865
169 Idaho 379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a search occurred when a drug dog’s “nose entered the car and the entry was momentary” while conducting an otherwise exterior sniff of the car
holding that “when a law enforcement drug detection dog intrudes, to any degree, into the interior space of a car during a drug sniff, without express or implied consent to do so, a search has occurred under the Fourth Amendment”
explaining that ”[w]ithout objective evidence bearing on the reliability of [the dog’s] behavior before his trained alert, we are left with little more than our intuition about the significance of that behavior”
explaining that, “without objective evidence bearing on the reliability of [the dog’s] behavior before his trained alert, we are left with little more than our intuition about the significance of that behavior”
explaining that, “without objective evidence bearing on the reliability of [the dog’s] behavior before his trained alert, we are left with little more than our intuition about the significance of that behavior”
explaining that, “without objective evidence bearing on the reliability of [the dog’s] behavior before his trained alert, we are left with little more than our intuition about the significance of that behavior”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.