State v. Riley
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3276
Syllabus
Consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C); R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c); juvenile record. Judgment affirmed. The defendant challenges the trial court's finding under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c), claiming that his juvenile criminal history does not provide support for the imposition of a discretionary consecutive sentence. However, a defendant's juvenile record may be considered as part of an offender's criminal conduct under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) for the purposes of determining whether to impose consecutive sentences. Based on the record before us, we cannot clearly and convincingly conclude that the record does not support the trial court's R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c) finding.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 1,498×
- State v. ShelineOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 86×
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-05-03· cited 40×
- State v. SteeleOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-14· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.