Skip to main content

State v. Riley

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 3276

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C); R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c); juvenile record. Judgment affirmed. The defendant challenges the trial court's finding under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c), claiming that his juvenile criminal history does not provide support for the imposition of a discretionary consecutive sentence. However, a defendant's juvenile record may be considered as part of an offender's criminal conduct under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) for the purposes of determining whether to impose consecutive sentences. Based on the record before us, we cannot clearly and convincingly conclude that the record does not support the trial court's R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c) finding.

Judges: Groves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.