State v. Riggins
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3254
Syllabus
AGGRAVATED MURDER – AGGRAVATED ROBBERY – EVIDENCE – BAD FAITH – HEARSAY – COUNSEL – ALLIED OFFENSES: Defendant failed to establish that the state had acted in bad faith by failing to preserve the recordings of phone calls that defendant made from the Hamilton County Justice Center where the investigating detective made repeated inquiries about obtaining the recordings and there was no evidence of why the Justice Center failed to fill the requests before the recordings were destroyed. [See CONCURRENCE: While the record does not demonstrate bad faith because we do not have information about why the Justice Center failed to act on the detective's request, the failure to preserve this important evidence in such a significant case is inexcusable.] Where the victim made a statement shortly before dying, but the record does not demonstrate that he understood that his death was imminent, his statement did not qualify as a dying declaration but the admission of the statement was not prejudicial because it did qualify as an excited utterance. Defendant's convictions for aggravated robbery and aggravated murder were based on sufficient evidence because the testimony of one of defendant's partners that they had gone out and tried to rob people and the victim's declaration that he had been robbed and shot were sufficient to establish that defendant had attempted to rob the victim prior to shooting him. Defendant's convictions for aggravated robbery and aggravated murder were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where defendant's partner testified that defendant had shot and killed the victim during a botched robbery, the vehicle defendant was in belonged to his mother, he was arrested on unrelated charges with the murder weapon, and he made a number of calls from jail that indicated he knew he was about to be charged with murder when no one had told him that was the charge they were investigating. Counsel was not ineffective for failing argue that there was no evidenc
Judges: Mock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 1,978×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 1,190×
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 773×
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPNinth Circuit· 2009-10-21· cited 441×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
- Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court· 1983-08-24· cited 379×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-08· cited 369×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 1993-05-26· cited 309×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.