Ninth Circuit· 10/21/2009
Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP
Citations
- 584 F.3d 1147
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23704
- 2009 WL 3365928
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a credit report that is misleading to such an extent that it can be expected to adversely affect credit decisions violates the FCRA
- holding that furnisher reasonably relied on conclusions of internal investigation and had no duty to reinvestigate
- holding that a consumer has a private right of action against a furnisher of credit information for willful or negligent noncompliance with the requirements in 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(b)(1)
- concluding that duties under the FCRA “are triggered ‘upon notice of dispute’—that is, when a person who furnished information to a[n] [agency] receives notice . . . that the consumer disputes the information”
- holding that “a disputed credit file that lacks a notation of dispute may well be ‘incomplete or inaccurate’ within the meaning of the FCRA, and the furnisher has a privately enforceable obligation to correct the information after notice.”
- explaining that a CRA’s reasonable reinvestigation “consists largely of triggering the investigation by the furnisher”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paez, Berzon, Baer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCNinth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 797×
- Edward Seamans v. Temple UniversityThird Circuit· 2014-02-21· cited 297×
- Chiang v. Verizon New England, Inc.First Circuit· 2010-02-09· cited 244×
- Simmsparris v. Countrywide Financial Corp.Third Circuit· 2011-07-28· cited 223×
- John Shaw v. Experian Information SolutionsNinth Circuit· 2018-05-29· cited 154×
- Frank Boggio v. USAA Federal Savings BankSixth Circuit· 2012-09-27· cited 133×
- Do Sung Uhm v. Humana, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-30· cited 128×
- Teri Lynn Hinkle v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2016-07-11· cited 82×
- Ross v. Federal Deposit InsuranceFourth Circuit· 2010-10-29· cited 81×
- Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-02-15· cited 81×
- Joseph Denan v. TransUnion LLCSeventh Circuit· 2020-05-11· cited 81×
- Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2010-03-26· cited 72×
- Kathleen N. Pedro v. Transunion LLCEleventh Circuit· 2017-08-24· cited 66×
- Drew v. Equifax Information Services, LLCNinth Circuit· 2012-08-07· cited 57×
- Keith William Erickson v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.Eleventh Circuit· 2020-12-04· cited 49×
- Marshall Gross v. Citimortgage, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2022-05-16· cited 48×
- Brown v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 44×
- Eid v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2010-07-30· cited 43×
- Jeffrey Chaitoff v. Experian Information SolutionsSeventh Circuit· 2023-08-14· cited 35×
- Taylor v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.N.D. California· 2016-09-13· cited 32×
Other cases named Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.