State v. Richardson

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 3490

Syllabus

Trial court did not err by issuing a nunc pro tunc entry to omit mention of post-release control. Post-release control was not a portion of the defendant's sentence for murder, an unclassified felony. Trial court was not required to conduct a resentencing prior to issuing nunc pro tunc entry. Trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failure to object to post-release control in original sentencing entry, as defendant was not prejudiced in any way by trial court's inclusion of an inoperative sanction.