Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/29/2020

State v. Everett

Citations

2020 Ohio 2733

Syllabus

Trial court properly removed incorrect imposition of post-relief control via nunc pro tunc entry. Plain error analysis is only available on direct appeal.Merger argument is not a void sentencing issue. Merger argument not raised at trial level or on direct appeal is barred by res judicata

Judges: Gwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

United States v. Frady
Supreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 5,791×
State v. Rogers
Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
State v. Fugate
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-03-06· cited 209×
Med. Mut. of Ohio v. Schlotterer
Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-06-03· cited 157×
State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School District Board
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-03-25· cited 45×
Smith v. Voorhies
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-10· cited 44×
State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 20×
State ex rel. Roberts v. Marsh (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-04-30· cited 14×
State ex rel. Allen v. Goulding (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-03-14· cited 13×
State v. Dominguez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-22· cited 8×
State v. Strickland
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-18· cited 7×
State v. Haynes
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-20· cited 5×
State v. Richardson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-29· cited 5×
State v. Everett
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-11· cited 3×
State v. Lusane
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-09· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.