Hawaii Supreme Court· 10/10/1995
State v. Richardson
Citations
- 904 P.2d 886
- 80 Haw. 1
- 1995 Haw. LEXIS 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a nighttime search was not reasonably necessary when drug transactions occurred throughout the night, but also in the early evening hours
- holding that a nighttime search was not reasonably necessary when drug transactions occurred throughout the night, but also in the early evening hours
- stating that \[o]ne policy underlying the nighttime search prohibition is protection of the greater expectation of privacy that individuals possess in their homes at night\
- stating that “[o]ne policy underlying the nighttime search prohibition is protection of the greater expectation of privacy that individuals possess in their homes at night”
- stating that nighttime search may be permissible when search “will not encroach upon either the special privacy interests or the public safety concerns that underlie the nighttime search prohibition”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-11· cited 69×
- State v. HaradaHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-02-27· cited 44×
- Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-07-25· cited 36×
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-12-06· cited 33×
- State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-07-21· cited 25×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-03-13· cited 17×
- State v. WilliamsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2014-09-22
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 4,784×
- United States v. Ronald Raymond Ravich and Edward McConnellSecond Circuit· 1970-02-06· cited 215×
- People v. KimbleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-02-25· cited 208×
- United States v. Clifton Gene GibbonsTenth Circuit· 1979-09-11· cited 103×
- Gooding v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-04-29· cited 98×
- People v. MardianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-04-09· cited 91×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Rudolph Boyance v. David N. Myers, SuperintendentThird Circuit· 1968-07-29· cited 65×
- People v. GoveaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-06-23· cited 50×
- State v. BrockOregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-16· cited 49×
- State v. KalaiHawaii Supreme Court· 1975-06-18· cited 48×
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-11-30· cited 36×
- State v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-02-08· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. GrimshawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-07-09· cited 27×
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-03-01· cited 25×
- State v. GarciaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1995-01-26· cited 24×
- United States v. SmithD. Connecticut· 1972-03-27· cited 23×
- Galena v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-10-21· cited 22×
- State v. RoweUtah Supreme Court· 1992-09-28· cited 21×
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-04-19· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.