Skip to main content

State v. Richardson

Citations

  • 904 P.2d 886
  • 80 Haw. 1
  • 1995 Haw. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a nighttime search was not reasonably necessary when drug transactions occurred throughout the night, but also in the early evening hours
  • holding that a nighttime search was not reasonably necessary when drug transactions occurred throughout the night, but also in the early evening hours
  • stating that \[o]ne policy underlying the nighttime search prohibition is protection of the greater expectation of privacy that individuals possess in their homes at night\
  • stating that “[o]ne policy underlying the nighttime search prohibition is protection of the greater expectation of privacy that individuals possess in their homes at night”
  • stating that nighttime search may be permissible when search “will not encroach upon either the special privacy interests or the public safety concerns that underlie the nighttime search prohibition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.