California Supreme Court· 2/25/1988
People v. Kimble
Citations
- 749 P.2d 803
- 44 Cal. 3d 480
- 244 Cal. Rptr. 148
- 1988 Cal. LEXIS 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- magistrate could infer that persons who had recently stolen stereo equipment would attempt to get rid of it quickly, since the theft was tied to a double homicide
- magistrate could infer that persons who had recently stolen stereo equipment would attempt to get rid of it quickly, since the theft was tied to a double homicide
- magistrate could conclude that permitting police to expedite their investigation was an exceptionally compelling reason to allow a nighttime search where dangerous killer or killers were still at large
- magistrate could conclude that permitting police to expedite their investigation was an exceptionally compelling reason to allow a nighttime search where dangerous killer or killers were still at large
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucas, Mosk, Broussard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-04-10· cited 674×
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-02-27· cited 632×
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court· 2017-03-20· cited 588×
- People v. KarisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-08-29· cited 553×
- People v. PrettymanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-12-09· cited 531×
- People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-04-06· cited 518×
- People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-03-03· cited 430×
- People v. Ralph International ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 425×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-03-24· cited 402×
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-08-07· cited 397×
- People v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-05-04· cited 380×
- People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-07-02· cited 378×
- People v. RaleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 376×
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 360×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-07-21· cited 359×
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 337×
- People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-09-05· cited 321×
- People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-09-15· cited 313×
- People v. SullyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-07-11· cited 313×
- People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-06-27· cited 310×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-07-03· cited 7,961×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- California v. BrownSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,207×
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-04-24· cited 1,166×
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 1,061×
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-02-04· cited 776×
- Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 757×
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-05· cited 731×
- Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1987-05-04· cited 672×
- Hicks v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 641×
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 606×
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-10-23· cited 560×
- Cabana v. BullockSupreme Court· 1986-01-22· cited 536×
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 510×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.