Skip to main content

State v. Rice

Citations

  • 683 P.2d 199
  • 102 Wash. 2d 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State must prove \general knowledge of [the defendant's] coparticipant's substantive crime\
  • holding that the State must prove “general knowledge of [the defendant’s] coparticipant’s substantive crime”
  • holding instruction warranted where defendants drank beer all day, took between two and five Quaaludes, could not hit ping-pong balls, and one did not feel being struck by a vehicle
  • relying on State v. Davis, 101 Wn.2d 654, 682 P.2d 883 (1984)
  • finding error where the trial court refused to instruct on voluntary intoxication after defendants testified “they had been drinking beer all day and had ingested between two and five Quaaludes each” and one stated he was “so loaded he didn’t feel it” when struck by a car
  • drunks who spilled beer and were uncoordinated while playing ping pong entitled to instruction; one felt no pain when hit by car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.