Skip to main content

State v. Ogden

Citations

  • 519 P.3d 1198
  • 171 Idaho 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court did not err in sentencing when it considered portions of the defendant’s presentence investigation report describing conduct for which the defendant was acquitted
  • concluding no abuse of discretion for failing to redline information related to prior conduct for which defendant was acquitted given requirements of Rule 32 in relation to contents of PSI
  • “The question of whether evidence is relevant is reviewed de novo, while the decision to admit relevant evidence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.