State v. Renfrew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even where a defendant voluntarily and intelligently waives his constitutional rights, we strongly disapprove of in-custody interrogations if defendant is represented by counsel and counsel has not had an opportunity to be present at the questioning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 58×
• People v. Landgham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-03-11· cited 56×
• State v. Lefthand
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-08-28· cited 34×
• State v. Chandler
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1980-09-09· cited 29×
• State v. Fossen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-03-25· cited 15×
• State v. Nunn
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-06-05· cited 11×
• State v. Parker
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-11-05· cited 6×
• Fiduciary Foundation, LLC v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-07-01· cited 6×
• State v. Hull
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-08-18· cited 5×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-01-21· cited 3×
• Finne v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-08-06· cited 1×
• State of Minnesota v. Michael Darron Ware
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-12-08

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Jackson v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
• State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. Tahash
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-10· cited 119×