Skip to main content

State v. Reed

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3461

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's post-conviction motion challenging an alleged procedural defect in the indictment. Because appellant could have challenged the adequacy of the indictment in the trial court or on direct appeal 44 years ago, res judicata precludes his challenge. Further, the trial court was not required to provide a statement of facts and conclusions of law. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.