Skip to main content

State v. Boyle

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3284

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant, after pleading guilty to a number of indictment counts (with the remaining counts being dismissed) and after his conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal, filed a motion asserting that the indictment was defective and seeking its dismissal. The trial court properly overruled the motion because Defendant-appellant's guilty pleas acted as a waiver of any defects in the indictment. Further, even if any indictment defects had not been waived, consideration of the issue would be barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.