Skip to main content

State v. Reed

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 138

Syllabus

In the case of multiple controlled drug buys, the judge issuing the search warrants had a substantial basis for belief that appellant was engaged in drug trafficking. Appellant's Confrontation Clause rights were not violated. Appellant's convictions for trafficking in a controlled counterfeit substance were not supported by sufficient evidence. The court did not err in joining two separate cases involving drug trafficking for trial.

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.