Skip to main content
· 7/16/1991

United States v. Edward T. Smith, Jr.

Citations

  • 940 F.2d 710
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 698
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15239
  • 1991 WL 127564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that the defendant rely on the advice and “continue! ] or initiate! ] the conduct”
  • suggesting that testimony from preliminary hearing might be used for purposes of impeachment at trial
  • suggesting that the defendant's testimony at a preliminary hearing could be \used against him for impeachment purposes at trial\
  • affirming exclusion of evidence purporting to raise the defense as immaterial as a matter of law
  • rejecting entrapment by estoppel defense because, while BATF agent purportedly told defendant that he wanted him to retain guns to assist in undercover investigation, agent never expressly told defendant that possession of firearms would be legal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Campbell, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.