Skip to main content

State v. Ray

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 5465

Syllabus

This court is without jurisdiction to consider defendant-appellant's arguments regarding whether her guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because she did not directly appeal the July 11, 2016 judgment entry of conviction and sentence or request a delayed appeal. Defendant-appellant made no argument in relation to the trial court's revocation of her judicial release and reimposition of the remainder of her original prison sentence as she is required to do under App.R. 12 and 16.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.