Skip to main content

State v. Hill

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4647

Syllabus

The defendant-appellant's rights under R.C. 2929.19 and Crim.R. 32 were not violated. Further, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant-appellant's community-control sanctions. Lastly, the defendant-appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.