Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/18/2000
State v. Silva
Citations
- 13 P.3d 143
- 170 Or. App. 440
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1720
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that both a driver and a passenger maintained constitutionally protected interests in a duffel bag found in 646 State v. Harmon a vehicle in which they had both been traveling
- factual findings consistent with trial court’s ultimate conclusion are binding on appellate court if there is constitutionally sufficient evidence in the record to support them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StandishCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 12×
- State v. HendonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 11×
- State v. CaprarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-15· cited 4×
- State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-28· cited 2×
- State v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-12-20
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 78×
- State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 61×
- State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 42×
- State v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-23· cited 11×
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22· cited 9×
- State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-10· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.