State v. Rasmussen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 6 an appellate court will not review pretrial issues if the appellant successfully argues that a trial under rule 26.01, subdivision 4, is invalid
• holding that a party who argues successfully on appeal that his right to a jury trial was not waived may not obtain appellate review of a pretrial suppression ruling under Lothenbach
• holding appellate review of pretrial ruling inappropriate when stipulated-facts trial under Lothenbach invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ehmke
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-07-15· cited 8×
• State v. Burdick
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-03-15· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tollett v. Henderson
  Supreme Court· 1973-04-17· cited 3,425×
• State v. Lothenbach
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 192×
• State v. Ross
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-02· cited 31×
• State v. Sandmoen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-07-22· cited 20×
• McLaughlin v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-10-08· cited 19×
• State v. Knoll
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-10-16· cited 13×
• State v. Balduc
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-04-12· cited 8×
• State v. Bunce
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-09-30· cited 5×