Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 3/15/2011
State v. Burdick
Citations
- 795 N.W.2d 873
- 2011 Minn. App. LEXIS 24
- 2011 WL 891042
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because parties failed to follow procedure outlined in rule 26.01, subdivision 4, “the pretrial issue reserved for appellate review . . . is not properly before this court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huspeni, Kalitowski, Minge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 192×
- A.C. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-01-13· cited 50×
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-08-12· cited 7×
- State v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-05-27· cited 5×
- State v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-05-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.