Skip to main content

State v. Knoll

Citations

  • 739 N.W.2d 919
  • 2007 Minn. App. LEXIS 133
  • 2007 WL 2993664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under the Lothenbach procedure, a defendant must expressly waive all the Minn. R. Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 3, rights and remanding for either an express waiver or a jury trial
  • stating that a Lothenbach procedure is more comparable to a guilty-plea procedure than a stipulated-facts trial, thus “weighting] in favor of a more rigorous waiver requirement”
  • explaining that procedure set forth in Minn. R. Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 4, was formerly known as a Lothenbach trial
  • reversing when required acknowledgements were deficient in Lothenbach proceeding, including defendant’s waiver of rights to testify, confront witnesses, and subpoena favorable witnesses
  • reversing conviction that resulted from Lothenbach proceeding, in absence of represented defendant’s valid waiver of rights to testify, confront witnesses against him, and subpoena favorable witnesses, without discussing prejudicial impact of faulty waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klaphake, Lansing, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.