State v. Rasheed
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 906
Syllabus
R.C. 2907.06 — SEXUAL IMPOSITION — EVIDENCE VIDEO — AUTHENTICATION — SUFFICIENCY AND WEIGHT : While the trial court abused its discretion by admitting improperly-authenticated video about which the victim had no personal knowledge and could not testify to how the surveillance system runs, the error was harmless because defendant's conviction for sexual imposition was overwhelmingly supported by the remaining evidence.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-20· cited 212×
- Midland Steel Products Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 486Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-10· cited 161×
- State v. Pickens (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-12-16· cited 130×
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-07-29· cited 87×
- State v. HoodOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-31· cited 76×
- State v. MacDonaldOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-06· cited 43×
- State v. CarsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-06· cited 37×
- State v. Chapman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 29×
- In re J.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-02· cited 25×
- State v. CrosstyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-01· cited 21×
- State v. EnglishOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 14×
- State v. SearlesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-02· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.