Skip to main content

State v. Holman

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1793

Syllabus

CRIM.R. 24 — VOIR DIRE — BATSON CHALLENGE — EVID.R. 403 —EVID.R. 1002 — BEST-EVIDENCE RULE — EVIDENCE — MANIFEST WEIGHT — SEXUAL IMPOSITION — SEXUAL CONTACT: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request for a new venire after the State provided a brief description of the allegations during its examination of the venire where the parties are permitted to provide an explanation of the circumstances of the offense to determine if prospective jurors have any bias, the State's explanation of circumstances was limited to uncontested allegations, and nothing in Crim.R. 24(A) limits the parties' ability to conduct voir dire under Crim.R. 24(B). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling defendant's challenge to the State's use of a peremptory strike of a juror under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), when the State's race-neutral explanation was that the prospective juror had been prosecuted for a crime several decades ago and the State believed the prospective juror stated during voir dire that he felt unfairly prosecuted at the time because, even though the record suggested that the juror stated he did not feel that he was unfairly prosecuted, defendant argued during his Batson challenge that the State was mistaken as to what the prospective juror stated and the trial court was in the best position to judge the prosecutor's credibility. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining the State's objection to defendant's questioning of a police officer regarding the officer's knowledge of male victims of sexual abuse or in excluding evidence of defendant's history of being a sexual-assault victim where defendant offered the testimony to show that he could have an erection without experiencing sexual gratification but the sexual-contact element of sexual imposition does not require proof that a person actually experienced sexual gratification and the probative value of the testimony was substantially outweighed

Judges: Bock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.