State v. Rashed
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3148
Syllabus
Restitution; hearing on restitution; dispute; ineffective assistance of counsel; R.C. 2929.18(A)(1). Judgment affirmed. Appellant has not demonstrated that there was a dispute as to the amount of restitution, thus triggering the trial court to hold a mandatory hearing pursuant to R.C. 2929.18(A)(1). Appellant also has not demonstrated how he was prejudiced by his counsel's alleged deficient conduct relating to requesting a hearing.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. Davis (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-02-04· cited 130×
- State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-02-27· cited 36×
- State v. NickensOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-20· cited 7×
- State v. LunaOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.