Skip to main content

State v. Randall

Citations

  • 669 So. 2d 223
  • 1995 WL 576993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Alabama's stalking law, § 13A-6-90 et seq., Ala. Code 1975, was not void for vagueness, even though the terms \repeatedly\ and \series\ were not specifically defined
  • holding that Alabama's stalking law, § 13A-6-90 et seq., Ala. Code 1975, was not void for vagueness, even though the terms \repeatedly\ and \series\ were not specifically defined in the statute
  • considering a constitutional challenge to the stalking statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.