Culbreath v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following the majority of courts and holding that the Alabama stalking statute was not unconstitutionally overbroad
• admitting evidence of prior complaint against defendant for limited purpose and not for its substance
• admitting evidence of prior complaint against defendant for limited purpose and not for its substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).