Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 10/19/2010
State v. Ramsay
Citations
- 789 N.W.2d 513
- 2010 Minn. App. LEXIS 154
- 2010 WL 4068756
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the primary purpose of a restitution award is for victim compensation
- reversing restitution award that “far exceeds the loss attributable to the offense of which [the defendant] was convicted”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klaphake, Schellhas, Toussaint
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-01· cited 73×
- State v. FaderSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-11-02· cited 57×
- State v. TenerelliSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-08-05· cited 49×
- State v. MaidiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-09-15· cited 25×
- State v. TerpstraSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 22×
- Theis v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-05-14· cited 20×
- State v. TholeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-07-11· cited 16×
- State v. ArendsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-08-10· cited 9×
- In Re the Welfare of M.R.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-06-13· cited 7×
- State v. SreySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-02-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.