Skip to main content

State v. Ramos

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 886

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's motion to suppress evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting the State's motion to dismiss one of the OVI charges pending against defendant-appellant. The trial court did not commit plain error by issuing a supplemental jury instruction.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.