State v. Ramirez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The state has no valid interest in requiring defendant to serve an unlawful sentence; for defendant, however, a significant liberty interest is at stake.”
• state has no valid interest in requiring a defendant to serve an unlawful sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Fults
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 218×
• State v. Ramirez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 157×
• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-19· cited 64×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-21· cited 19×
• State v. Fults
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-27· cited 9×
• State v. Steele
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 6×
• State v. Norman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-12· cited 5×
• State v. Shelters
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 5×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 5×
• State v. Lennon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-21· cited 4×
• State v. Shellabarger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11· cited 3×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 3×
• State v. Tarkington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 3×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-24· cited 2×
• State v. Steinhoff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11· cited 2×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11· cited 2×
• State v. Erickson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 2×
• State v. Carroll
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-25· cited 2×
• State v. McDaniel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-05· cited 2×
• State v. Pratt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 2×