State v. Quinn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that evidence of victim’s prior acts of prostitution is not admissible where defendant does not claim the defense of consent to an act of prostitution
• court noted strong evidence of force destroys issue of consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Towery
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 120×
• People v. Williams
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1982-12-23· cited 40×
• State v. Reinhold
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-05-31· cited 39×
• Brewer v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-31· cited 33×
• Holloway v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-08-08· cited 20×
• People v. Slovinski
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-02-01· cited 12×
• Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-03-25· cited 11×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Douglas v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
• Mancusi v. Stubbs
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 704×
• State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-02-02· cited 90×
• State v. Bateman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-03-10· cited 61×
• State v. Jones
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-25· cited 35×