Skip to main content

State v. Putnam

Citations

  • 675 A.2d 422
  • 164 Vt. 558
  • 1996 Vt. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that administrative judge has discretion in deciding disqualification issues, and Court reviews for “abuse of discretion, that is, if the record reveals no reasonable basis for the decision” (citation omitted)
  • stating there is no per se rule requiring recusal “where a spouse or other relative is employed by, or is otherwise aligned with, a party appearing before the judge” and citing cases
  • judge permitted to preside over criminal trial where officers from her husband’s police barracks were involved in investigation and as trial witnesses
  • rule of per se disqualification is generally inappropriate in circumstances where Code of Judicial Conduct does not require disqualification
  • “[T]he question of recusal hinges on the administrative judge’s exercise of discretion.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.