Skip to main content
· 7/20/1990

United States v. Kehlbeck

Citations

  • 766 F. Supp. 707
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18923
  • 1990 WL 300355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no per se disqualification where “friend appears as counsel, party, or witness”; collecting cases
  • fact that judge was socially acquainted with defendant did not require disqualification
  • where defendant alleged that judge could not be impartial where the judge had socialized with a witness, the court disagreed, stating that “[r]arely does a judge's mere acquaintance with a party or witness justify recusal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.