State v. Pugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statutes did not authorize the court to issue a no-contact order as part of an executed sentence
• stating that a defendant cannot forfeit or waive review of an illegal sentence
• vacating no-contact order imposed as part of sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct
• “Because courts have authority to correct an illegal sentence at any time under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, a defendant cannot forfeit, or waive by silence, review of an illegal sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Washington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-04-07· cited 30×
• State v. Wilder
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-04-10· cited 9×
• State v. Brist
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-06-06· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• State v. Olson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-11· cited 141×
• State v. Maurstad
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-06-14· cited 78×
• Taylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-11-06· cited 75×
• Laux v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-02-02· cited 35×
• State v. Schmidt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-06-22· cited 22×
• State v. Post
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 15×