Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1/16/1980
State v. Pruitt
Citations
- 289 N.W.2d 343
- 95 Wis. 2d 69
- 1980 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the defendant's theory that he lacked the requisite intent was adequately explained to the jury through the general instructions on intent
- underlying discretionary determinations are questions of fact and questions of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Voss, P.J., Brown and Bode
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. VickWisconsin Supreme Court· 1981-12-01· cited 49×
- State v. ZanelliCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1997-07-15· cited 36×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-03-27· cited 30×
- State v. HobbsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-07-29· cited 25×
- State v. CobleWisconsin Supreme Court· 1981-02-02· cited 20×
- State v. RoubikCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-02-17· cited 19×
- State v. LedererCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-10-28· cited 15×
- State v. HerrigesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1990-03-07· cited 12×
- State v. OlexaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-01-21· cited 10×
- State v. HessCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-09-23· cited 8×
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1991-06-11· cited 5×
- State v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-10-25· cited 4×
- State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-04-30
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1979-01-16· cited 615×
- United States v. TestTenth Circuit· 1976-11-12· cited 188×
- United States v. ButeraFirst Circuit· 1970-01-21· cited 145×
- United States v. Lavance Greene, United States of America v. Randolph GreeneD.C. Circuit· 1974-02-01· cited 124×
- State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 122×
- United States v. GuzmanS.D. New York· 1972-01-10· cited 101×
- Catherine Foster, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. James L. Sparks, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1975-01-20· cited 96×
- United States v. Richard Frederick RossNinth Circuit· 1972-10-26· cited 78×
- United States v. John Joseph Ditommaso, United States of America v. Charles Forest WaugamanFourth Circuit· 1969-03-24· cited 75×
- State v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 1969-10-03· cited 56×
- United States v. Gerard Allyn OlsonEighth Circuit· 1973-05-21· cited 52×
- Barrow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-06-07· cited 36×
- McAllister v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-11-03· cited 19×
- Schultz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-01-30· cited 18×
- Novitzke v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-11-06· cited 15×
- People v. RedwineMichigan Court of Appeals· 1973-11-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.