Wisconsin Supreme Court· 12/1/1981
State v. Vick
Citations
- 312 N.W.2d 489
- 104 Wis. 2d 678
- 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 3055
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- basing an absorption curve defense on breathalyzer test result and testimony from defendant as to the amount of alcohol he had consumed
- basing an absorption curve defense on breathalyzer test result and testimony from defendant as to the amount of alcohol he had consumed
- contrasting use of \may\ and \shall\ in context of jury instructions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William G. Callow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Dale R. NeumannWisconsin Supreme Court· 2013-07-03· cited 49×
- State v. ZelenkaWisconsin Supreme Court· 1986-05-08· cited 44×
- State v. McCoyWisconsin Supreme Court· 1988-03-22· cited 38×
- State v. BohacheffWisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-10-04· cited 37×
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-08-22· cited 19×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-10· cited 17×
- State v. BoshckaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1992-12-17· cited 17×
- State v. LeverettMontana Supreme Court· 1990-09-18· cited 10×
- State v. MorseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1985-08-06· cited 10×
- Imark Industries, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-08-25· cited 9×
- State v. SchambowCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1993-04-14· cited 8×
- La Chance v. Thermogas Co. of LenaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-09-04· cited 3×
- State v. Alan M. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2021-06-16· cited 3×
- State v. Leilani E. NeumannWisconsin Supreme Court· 2013-07-03
- State v. FonteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-08-04
- Opinion No. Oag 21-86, (1986)Wisconsin Attorney General Reports· 1986-06-20
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court· 1973-12-04· cited 2,639×
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,990×
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,672×
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,629×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- Cool v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-12-04· cited 288×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1926-04-19· cited 200×
- Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1978-10-03· cited 42×
- State v. DixWisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 31×
- State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-01-16· cited 26×
- Ross v. IsraelE.D. Wisconsin· 1980-11-21· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.