Skip to main content

State v. Propp

Citations

  • 345 Or. App. 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in the wake of more recent Supreme Court case law, “we understand Haltom’s two-step approach to be an available tool that we should use as appropriate”
  • describing the methodology required by Simonov, Haltom, and Carlisle
  • “When criminality depends on the child’s being under a specified age other than 16, it is an affirma- tive defense for the defendant to prove that the defendant reasonably believed the child to be above the specified age at the time of the alleged offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aoyagi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.