Oregon Supreme Court· 8/4/2022

State v. Carlisle

Citations

370 Or. 137
515 P.3d 867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the legislature would not have under- stood “sexual contact” as a fundamentally consensual act, and therefore would not have considered consent to be part of the essential nature of the conduct described in third-degree sexual abuse
explaining that the legislature would not have under- stood “sexual contact” as a fundamentally consensual act, and therefore would not have considered consent to be part of the essential nature of the conduct described in third-degree sexual abuse
explaining the holistic approach used to discern whether the legislature intended the knowingly mental state to apply to an element of a crime
explain- ing the holistic approach used to discern whether the legis- lature intended the knowingly mental state to apply to an element of a crime
confirm- ing that conduct elements are tied “in part” to a defendant’s bodily movements, but also could include some elements that describe the essential character of the prohibited act
confirm- ing that conduct elements are tied “in part” to a defendant’s bodily movements, but also could include some elements that describe the essential character of the prohibited act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.