Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/20/2023
State v. Prophet
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3833
Syllabus
Appellant failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel in declining to subpoena a witness, a decision within the rubric of trial strategy. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a mistrial premised upon that same substantive basis. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 1,978×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 846×
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-26· cited 801×
- State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court· 1991-11-20· cited 798×
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 773×
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 737×
- State v. Cepec (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-13· cited 94×
- State v. DurstOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-21· cited 11×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-13· cited 6×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-29· cited 6×
- State v. BenderOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-17· cited 4×
- State v. LoftonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.