Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/13/2019
State v. Jones
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3704
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence despite novel argument regarding certification and use of canine law enforcement officers. Appellant was not prejudiced by trial counsel's decision-making, and therefore not denied his constitutionally protected rights. Decision of the trial court is affirmed.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-30· cited 5×
- State v. ProphetOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-20· cited 1×
- State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-19· cited 1×
- State v. JeterOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-12
- State v. KittoOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-25
- State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-05
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 1,624×
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-26· cited 801×
- Florida v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2013-02-19· cited 782×
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-04· cited 426×
- State v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court· 1998-10-28· cited 226×
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 156×
- State v. JesterOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-26· cited 113×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-07-31· cited 16×
- United States v. SummersS.D. California· 2015-12-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.