Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3704

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence despite novel argument regarding certification and use of canine law enforcement officers. Appellant was not prejudiced by trial counsel's decision-making, and therefore not denied his constitutionally protected rights. Decision of the trial court is affirmed.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.