District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/21/2014
State v. Proctor
Citations
- 161 So. 3d 409
- 2014 WL 656751
- 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that law enforcement possessed probable cause to stop Proctor for \driving at 3:30 a.m. on a deserted street without headlights for a brief period of time\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berger, Evander, Sawaya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-07-03· cited 93×
- Patrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-12-06· cited 59×
- STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY v. DeShongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-14· cited 33×
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-24· cited 23×
- Esteen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-05· cited 19×
- Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-29· cited 17×
- State v. CarrilloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-07· cited 16×
- Yanes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-28· cited 13×
- Ndow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-30· cited 11×
- State v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-17· cited 8×
- State v. DavidsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 8×
- State v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-11· cited 3×
- Payne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.