Skip to main content

State v. Pounds

Citations

  • 500 N.W.2d 373
  • 176 Wis. 2d 315
  • 1993 Wisc. App. LEXIS 428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant was in custody for Miranda purposes even though he \was initially told that he was free to leave\
  • courts used fact that defendant was handcuffed as factor supporting decision that defendant was in custody for Miranda purposes
  • court used fact that gun was drawn on defendant during questioning to support decision that defendant was in custody for Miranda purposes
  • courts used fact that defendant had been ordered to the floor or ground at gunpoint before the questioning to support decisions that defendant was in custody for Miranda purposes
  • court used fact that defendant was transported from the scene of his original detention to another location in a squad car to support decision that defendant was in custody for Miranda purposes
  • court of appeals holds that defendant was \in custody\ for Fifth Amendment purposes, even though he was only being detained pursuant to a Terry stop, stating that, \We disagree with the trial court's implicit assumption that Miranda is never implicated in the context of a Terry stop.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nettesheim, Brown, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.