Connecticut Appellate Court· 4/25/2006
State v. Potter
Citations
- 894 A.2d 1063
- 95 Conn. App. 89
- 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denial of motion for treatment as youthful offender
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flynn, Bishop, Dipentima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Chong ChungSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-13· cited 77×
- State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-06-26· cited 45×
- Corpus-Hooker v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-11-26· cited 43×
- Echavarria v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-09-13· cited 39×
- State v. LasagaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-01· cited 18×
- State v. Sandra O.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-01-05· cited 12×
- State v. Cedric S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-01-19· cited 4×
- State v. PotterConnecticut Superior Court· 2004-09-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.