Skip to main content

State v. Munoz

Citations

  • 932 A.2d 443
  • 104 Conn. App. 85
  • 2007 Conn. App. LEXIS 394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • state, which stipulated at trial that trial court’s ruling on motion to suppress was dispositive of case, was estopped from asserting otherwise or that motion to suppress did not fit within parameters of § 54-94a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dipentima, Lavine, Dupont

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.