State v. Poole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the State’s peremptory strike of a potential juror who would not speak up and appeared disinterested
• upholding trial court’s finding of no discriminatory purpose because it was not “clearly erroneous”
• “If the instruction is given prior to deliberation, ‘all question with regard to the coercive effect of the same would be removed.’ ”
• percentage of African-Americans on venire panel and percentage of African-Americans who end up on jury panel, although not determinative, is relevant in determining whether there was purposeful discrimination
• where evidence is “overwhelming,” error in giving Allen instruction did not require reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Whitaker
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-04-15· cited 73×
• State v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-04-19· cited 50×
• State v. Trotter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-03· cited 47×
• State v. Washington
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-05-09· cited 47×
• State v. Walston
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-12-09· cited 27×
• State v. Arteaga
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-02· cited 25×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-10-31· cited 17×
• State v. Bolton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-07-12· cited 17×
• State v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-12-08· cited 5×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-03-02· cited 4×
• State v. Percival
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-11-21· cited 3×