Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/23/2009
State v. Lawrence
Citations
- 217 P.3d 1084
- 231 Or. App. 1
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Offering to sell a controlled substance constitutes a substantial step toward a completed transfer of that substance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sandoval v. SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-01-27· cited 22×
- Leonel Sandoval v. Sally YatesNinth Circuit· 2017-01-27· cited 10×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-16· cited 5×
- State v. RheeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-17· cited 3×
- State v. HirschmanDeschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-07· cited 3×
- State v. FryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-24· cited 1×
- Leonel Sandoval v. Jefferson B. SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-08-08
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-06· cited 71×
- State v. WaltersOregon Supreme Court· 1991-01-17· cited 66×
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 33×
- State v. PollockOregon Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 18×
- State v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-30· cited 15×
- State v. ClellandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-11· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.