State v. Daly
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 632
Syllabus
The trial court erred in allowing the State, upon remand, to amend the criminal complaint pursuant to Crim.R. 7(D) and in reaffirming the court's previously-entered judgment of conviction. The trial court's consideration of the Crim.R. 7(D) motion exceeded the scope of our appellate mandate, and Crim.R. 7(D) cannot be used to correct a jurisdictional defect in a criminal complaint. Judgment reversed remanded for the filing of an order dismissing the case.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- Hopkins v. DyerOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-17· cited 130×
- State v. MbodjiOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-21· cited 107×
- Giancola v. Azem (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-05-03· cited 66×
- State v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-22· cited 20×
- State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-23· cited 16×
- State v. DaviesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-08· cited 14×
- L.G. Harris Family Ltd. Partnership I v. 905 S. Main St. Englewood, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-07· cited 10×
- Bridge v. Park National BankOhio Court of Appeals· 2006-10-31· cited 6×
- State v. PoirierOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.